The Work of Art in the Age of Biocybernetic Reproduction Review
Modernism/modernity 10.three (2003) 481-500
[Admission commodity in PDF]
The Piece of work of Art in the Age of Biocybernetic Reproduction
W. J. T. Mitchell
[Figures]
Until you lot were born, robots didn't dream, they didn't have desires.
—Said to the robot boy David by his designer—AI Stephen Spielberg
The life of images has taken a decisive turn in our time: the oldest myth about the cosmos of living images, the fabrication of an intelligent organism past artificial, technical means, has now become a theoretical and practical possibility cheers to new constellations of media at many unlike levels. The convergence of genetic and computational technologies with new forms of speculative uppercase has turned cyberspace and biospace, the inner structure of organisms, into frontiers for technical innovation, appropriation, and exploitation—new forms of objecthood and territoriality for a new form of empire. In AI, Stephen Spielberg registers this change by telling a story most the invention of an image that is, quite literally, a "desiring machine." David, the contemporary answer to Pinocchio, is a robot boy with dreams and desires, and with an plainly fully elaborated human subjectivity. He is programmed to honey and to need love, a demand that becomes so obsessive (he is in contest with his real human being "blood brother" for the love of his mother) that he is rejected and becomes an orphan. To the question, "What do pictures want?" the answer in this instance is clear: they desire to be loved, and to exist "existent."
The genius of AI is not in its narrative, which is full of clunky, implausible moments, but in its vision of a new globe and its [Finish Page 481] new objects. David is a perfectly photogenic, adorable simulacrum of a boy who is loveable and endearing in every manner. The filmic point of view encourages us to identify with him throughout, and to despise his mother for rejecting him. Yet underlying the sickeningly sugariness fantasy of female parent-son bliss (a utopian resolution of the Oedipus circuitous?) is the horror of the double, the encounter with ane's own mirror paradigm rendered autonomous, a horror that even the robot boy is capable of feeling when he sees scores of his ain duplicates on the assembly line, ready to be packaged for the Christmas shopping season. The fantasy of AI, then, is a kind of extreme exaggeration of the uncanny, when the former, familiar phobia or superstition is realized in an unexpected way. This fantasy was, of course, ever already predicted from the moment of the cosmos of Adam from the red clay of the ground, the creation of the first drawing with the red earth of vermilion, the casting of the Golden Calf from Egyptian gold. In our time, the materials are organic substances, proteins, cells, Dna molecules, and the shaping, casting procedures are computational. This is the age of biocybernetic reproduction, when (as we suppose) images actually do come alive and want things. What follows is an attempt to sketch out a thick description of this moment, and to appraise some of the creative practices that take accompanied it.
The current revolutions in biology and computers signified here by the images of the double helix and the Turing Motorcar (figs. ane and 2) and their implications for ethics and politics raise a host of new questions for which the arts, traditional humanistic disciplines, and Enlightenment modes of rationality may seem ill-prepared. What good is information technology fifty-fifty to talk about the human if a humanist similar Katherine Hayles is correct in arguing that nosotros live in a post-human age? one What is the point of asking the great philosophical questions about the meaning of life, when we seem to be on the verge of reducing this most ancient question of metaphysics to what Giorgio Agamben has called "bare life," a matter of technical means, a calculable chemical process? two And what about the aboriginal mystery of death in a time of neomorts, indefinitely extended comas, and organ transplants? Is death now merely a problem to be solved by engineering and adjudicated...
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the all-time experience on our website. Without cookies your feel may not exist seamless.
Source: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/46443/summary
0 Response to "The Work of Art in the Age of Biocybernetic Reproduction Review"
إرسال تعليق