How Do You Know if Your Processor Is Bad
Hollywood seems determined to profit from remakes and sequels that movie makers have no business writing, producing or releasing. Rather than working hard to generate new films — ones with novel plot devices, leads and stories from underrepresented communities and compelling cinematic visions, for example — the bigwigs of the American motion-picture show manufacture are on a mission to quickly ruin any remnant of millennial babyhood nostalgia.
So, it is with a heavy centre — and in recognition that January 10, 2021, marks five years since the passing of the absolutely legendary and incomparable David Bowie — that I am forced to accost the declaration of a Labyrinth sequel. Now, does the original moving picture require, necessitate or even hint at a sequel? Is the lead actor from the original motion-picture show prepared to brand an appearance? Is the original director still available? The answer to these questions is a single, resounding "NO." And notwithstanding, hither we are. Sigh.
Allow me to take a brief moment to discuss why a Labyrinth sequel is an awful, terrible, no-skillful thought.
A Bowie-Less Labyrinth Sequel Will Be a Travesty
The upcoming Labyrinth sequel faces some tough challenges. For starters, information technology'southward going to be missing its eternal, androgynous Jareth the Goblin King — a.grand.a. the incomparable David Bowie. In 2016, the iconic genre- and gender-bending stone star lost a long battle with liver cancer. His failing wellness was a well-kept secret, and fans and admirers from all over the earth mourned his untimely passing.
If you lot believe that Bowie's absence from a Labyrinth sequel is more a casting challenge than a reason to cancel the unabridged project, I'd recommend that you go back and scout the original 1986 flick. Bowie's presence extends across his insanely flustered hairdo, gigantic codpiece and cool charismatic demeanor — the man too wrote and performed more than half of the picture's soundtrack.
Seeing Bowie perform every bit Jareth is much like watching him as Ziggy Stardust. It can be challenging to separate the truth from the fiction of these performances, equally Bowie becomes so engrossed in his label that he simply ceases to exist himself. Fifty-fifty as an developed, it's difficult to watch Jareth the Goblin Male monarch prance, dance and sing without occasionally stopping to call up, "Wow. That actually is David Bowie. And, aye, I will 'Dance the Magic Dance' down my hallway."
I'm sorry, just it'southward incommunicable for a casting director to find a multitalented actor/musician to make full Bowie'south shoes in an upcoming sequel. It's also a claiming to imagine any feasible reason why the original — seemingly immortal — Goblin King would have all of a sudden changed form. This type of confusion only deepens when considering what might get of the Labyrinth's creatures.
Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, directed the original Labyrinth motion picture. His masterful puppetry showed a depth of skill unmatched past rival puppeteers, and in a time without impressive CGI graphics, he was i of the go-to guys for practical special effects. Sadly, Henson passed away in 1990. Since that time, there have been no less than five theatrical releases with his charming Muppet characters — and they've all been awful.
Some might have those movies as a sign that Henson'south absence is no big bargain when attempting to make a sequel. They would be incredibly wrong. A Labyrinth sequel without Bowie AND Jim Henson would be like a Mrs. Doubtfire sequel without Robin Williams. (Don't you cartel, 20th Century Fox!) Only stop thinking about it and appreciate this magic for what information technology is!
Making a sequel to the Labyrinth moving-picture show without using Henson's puppets would be like George Lucas abandoning applied puppetry from his Star Wars franchise in favor of poorly-generated computer graphics. Oh…that's already happened, and the response has been less-than-stellar. Fans who accept grown up watching a specific picture are bound to feel slighted, misunderstood or but plain cheated when that motion picture ends up lost in technological translation.
Not convinced that fans don't want a CGI-heavy Labyrinth remake? Take a look at how The Lion Rex fanbase (and critics) reacted to the CGI "alive-activeness"' Disney remake. Hither's a spoiler: They didn't similar information technology.
A Project Fueled by Profits, Not Passions
All of this begs the question, "Why are these executives green-lighting so many '80s remakes and sequels right now?" Unfortunately, the answer lies in nostalgia-based profit. Academics take long studied consumer beliefs, and it seems that recent studies have not fallen on deaf ears.
In 2014, the Journal of Consumer Inquiry published findings on the connection between nostalgia and coin-spending habits. They discovered that people are more willing to spend money when they're feeling sentimental or nostalgic. Advertizement executives and flick producers have taken this tidbit of information and run with it.
That's why our current film industry is flooded with remakes and unasked-for sequels, especially to icons from the 1980s and 1990s. Children from that era are now full-fledged adults with existential dread about the future as climate change, pandemics and political chaos leave generations clamoring for familiar, comforting nostalgia.
Just rather than re-releasing original footage on updated media (think Blu-ray and 4K downloads), the film manufacture would rather take existing intellectual property and rebrand information technology for the younger generation. In most cases, the outcome is an alienated original audience and a disinterested youth. This is all done in the proper name of and for the sake of turn a profit.
And then Please, Go out This Precious stone of a Pic Solitary
A movie shouldn't exist pre-judged as good or bad, of course, but should instead be judged past its merit, reception and lasting affect. Still, even the most avant-garde hologram technology could not revive Bowie's onscreen presence (NOR SHOULD Information technology). And no corporeality of CGI could supersede the actuality and wonder of Henson'due south creations.
The only thing that could remain consistent betwixt the original Labyrinth pic and its proposed sequel is its main screenwriter, Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame and glory). But as of this moment, there'south no give-and-take from the aging Brit as to his possible interest in writing a sequel.
Equally a outcome, there's little hope that a Labyrinth 2 would be annihilation more than a shameless, soulless cash grab aimed at adults who long for the simpler, stranger world that lay earlier them during the '80s. Whatever project based on profit, not passion, is doomed to neglect, and that'southward why I'g not looking forrard to the mess of a sequel that undoubtedly lies alee.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/labyrinth-sequel-bad-idea?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "How Do You Know if Your Processor Is Bad"
إرسال تعليق